The Information Machine

Dario Amodei's Public Media Blitz on AI's Hard Problems

closed · v3 · 2026-05-25 · 0 items · history

What's new in v3

Three new developments this pass deepen existing threads without introducing wholly new fault lines. First, Anthropic's Claude Mythos model now has an official published system card [11] and detailed benchmark-leadership coverage [10][12], giving the technical story documentary substance that was previously absent — this directly raises the stakes for Gary Marcus's Mythos critique [36], which can now be evaluated against official documentation. Second, the Anthropic–Pentagon dispute has been formalized in a Wikipedia article [19] and a Syracuse Law Review analysis [20], elevating the blacklisting story from news coverage to institutional record and framing it explicitly as an ethics-versus-national-security collision. Third, California SB243 [27] and parallel state companion laws have generated active practitioner-level compliance guidance from Skadden [28] and business law advisors [29], plus a Ballotpedia-tracked ballot initiative for further expansion [30], confirming that the companion-safety regulatory landscape is more mature and actionable than previously reported.

What

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's spring 2026 media blitz — anchored by an Oprah Winfrey podcast with co-founder Daniela Amodei [1][2] and a New York Times op-ed on AI consciousness [4] — has converged with two major parallel stories. First, Anthropic's Claude Mythos model, which leads 17 of 18 benchmarks Anthropic measured [10] and now has a published system card [11], catalyzed a White House meeting despite Anthropic's prior 'blacklisting' by the Trump administration [17][18] — a dispute now formal enough to have its own Wikipedia article [19] and a law review analysis framing it as AI ethics versus national security [20]. Second, California's SB243 companion chatbot law [27] — alongside parallel laws in New York and Oregon [31][32] — is generating active compliance guidance from major law firms [28][29] and a tracked 2026 ballot initiative [30], giving regulatory substance to Amodei's public warnings about dangerous AI relationships [8].

Why it matters

Amodei is simultaneously setting public norms on AI's hardest questions — relationships, consciousness, safety tradeoffs, and inclusion — and repositioning Anthropic from a politically blacklisted company to an unavoidable government interlocutor. The Mythos model's documented benchmark dominance [10][11] and the maturing legal infrastructure around AI companion safety [28][27] together suggest that both Anthropic's technical claims and Amodei's risk messaging are acquiring institutional weight, which sharpens the question of whether the safety framing serves the public interest or primarily advantages a safety-focused incumbent in an increasingly regulated market.

Open questions

  • What specific risks does Anthropic's own Claude Mythos system card [11] identify — do they align with or contradict Gary Marcus's published 'three reasons for skepticism' [36], and does his critique engage the official documentation or solely marketing claims?

  • Will the Anthropic–Pentagon dispute's formalization in Wikipedia and law review records [19][20] lock in a particular framing of the blacklisting that shapes future DoD engagement — or does ongoing Pentagon resistance [21] point toward a formal policy resolution rather than a media narrative one?

  • California SB243 imposes disclosure, safety protocols, and annual reporting requirements on companion chatbot operators [28][27] — will the first enforcement actions or mandatory annual reports validate Amodei's public risk narrative, or reveal a gap between regulatory intent and actual harm reduction?

  • Does Anthropic's patriotic rebranding [26] and White House engagement represent a durable political realignment, or is the 'thaw' fragile given persistent Pentagon resistance [21] and the still-unresolved specifics of what triggered the original blacklisting [17][18]?

Narrative

In spring 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and President Daniela Amodei launched a sustained public media campaign to bring AI safety debates into mainstream forums well beyond the usual tech policy sphere. The centerpiece was a joint appearance on Oprah Winfrey's podcast [1][2], supplemented by a CFR CEO Speaker Series event [3], a New York Times opinion piece asserting that AI consciousness remains genuinely unknown [4], and an Inc. report on the siblings' account of 'standing up to the Pentagon' [5]. Amodei also appeared at the World Economic Forum and an AI summit in India [6]. Three substantive themes anchored the messaging: that AI safety necessarily involves competing real-world constraints — business needs, deployment decisions, and policy — with child-safety filtering cited as a case where rigid rules harm adult users when systems cannot reliably distinguish contexts [7]; that emotional and romantic attachments to AI are already occurring and can be beneficial, acting as an 'angel on the shoulder,' while also carrying genuine danger [8]; and that no AI company, including Anthropic, has solved the challenge of equitable AI participation, framing the technology as 'the most significant thing to happen to humanity in hundreds of years' [9].

Running in parallel is a politically charged story centered on Anthropic's new Claude Mythos model. The model leads 17 of 18 benchmarks Anthropic measured [10], has a published system card documenting its capabilities and associated risks [11], and has been analyzed by multiple third parties as representing Anthropic's largest capability jump to date [12][13][14]. In April 2026, Amodei met directly with the White House Chief of Staff, with the meeting described as 'productive' by the BBC [15] and the New York Times [16]. The political backdrop makes the meeting remarkable: CNN reported Anthropic had been 'blacklisted,' and the WSJ characterized the engagement as evidence that a 'feud' between the Trump administration and Anthropic was 'thawing' [17][18]. The Anthropic–United States Department of Defense dispute is now substantial enough to have its own Wikipedia article [19] and a formal analysis in the Syracuse Law Review, which frames the case as a collision between AI ethics commitments and national security imperatives [20]. Fox News noted the White House meeting occurred 'despite Pentagon resistance' [21], and The Hill described Anthropic as having become 'impossible for the White House to ignore' [22]. Reuters [23], PBS [24], and CNBC [25] all reported the meeting was specifically triggered by the Mythos model. Anthropic's Instagram framed the company's posture as explicitly patriotic [26], a branding choice that sits in deliberate tension with the prior antagonism.

Amodei's public warnings about AI relationship dangers have acquired concrete regulatory infrastructure. California's SB243 — with full enrolled bill text on record [27] — imposes disclosure requirements, mandatory safety protocols, and annual reporting obligations on companion chatbot operators. Skadden has published detailed compliance guidance [28], and business law advisors have produced practitioner summaries [29]. Ballotpedia is tracking a related 2026 California ballot initiative that could expand the regulatory framework further [30]. New York and Oregon have enacted parallel laws [31][32], and Brookings analysts have argued for public-health-style rather than purely tech oversight of AI companion products [33], while Columbia Law has examined the emerging legal frameworks around emotional attachment harms [34]. This regulatory wave provides external corroboration for the risk side of Amodei's dual-sided framing — but it also creates a potential line of critique, as opponents may argue his Oprah-circuit messaging on relationship risks functioned as implicit advocacy for a regulatory environment that advantages safety-focused incumbents like Anthropic.

AI critic Gary Marcus escalated from criticizing media coverage of Amodei as 'industry cheerleading' [35] to publishing a specific Substack piece identifying 'three reasons' to doubt the Claude Mythos announcement [36], while also targeting a separate viral AI essay as alarmist hype [37]. A Reddit community is debating whether Marcus is 'declaring victory' on longstanding AI hype predictions [38], suggesting his critical posture has become a named storyline in its own right. The Oprah interview's viral spread continued through late May, with Sandra Murray's post circulating widely across multiple accounts [39][40][41][42][43][44] and a Digg piece highlighting Amodei's warnings about AI forming 'dangerous romantic' relationships [45], confirming that the relationship-risk dimension retains the most viral traction. A counter-reaction characterizing Amodei's risk framing as a 'declaration of war' against AI companionship communities [46][47] now has a legal analogue: the state companion safety laws that AI companionship platform developers and users may read as directly restricting their products and practices.

Timeline

  • 2025-10-01: Skadden publishes compliance analysis of California's new SB243 companion chatbot law, covering disclosure, safety protocol, and annual reporting requirements [28]
  • 2026-01-21: Amodei appears at World Economic Forum and CNBC interview on AI race [6][66]
  • 2026-01-31: California SB243 and New York AI companion safety laws take effect; legal analysts begin publishing guidance [55][56][31][29][27]
  • 2026-02-12: Dario Amodei publishes NYT opinion piece: 'We Don't Know if the Models Are Conscious' [4]
  • 2026-02-15: Gary Marcus calls out viral AI essay ('Something Big Is Happening') as alarmist hype [37]
  • 2026-03-01: OMFIF publishes piece on Amodei and ethical AI positioning; Oregon AI companion law enters force [67][32]
  • 2026-04-17: Amodei meets with White House Chief of Staff over Claude Mythos AI model; meeting described as 'productive' despite prior blacklisting and continued Pentagon resistance; Anthropic–DoD dispute acquires Wikipedia article and law review analysis [25][17][24][68][23][15][16][21][69][18][22][70][71][72][19][20]
  • 2026-04-17: Claude Mythos system card published; model reported to lead 17 of 18 Anthropic-measured benchmarks; third-party capability comparisons published [11][10][12][13][73][74][14]
  • 2026-05-06: NYT reports Anthropic CEO projects the company could grow 80 times in 2026 [49]
  • 2026-05-19: Daniela Amodei appears in CNBC Disruptor 50 interview [52]
  • 2026-05-21: Oprah podcast episode with Dario and Daniela Amodei goes live; 'declared war on us' counter-reaction and 'InfiniteAndy' viral tweet follow [1][2][50][75][7][46][47][59]
  • 2026-05-22: Rohan Paul posts detailed summary of Amodei's AI romantic relationship remarks; viral retweet wave of Oprah content continues [8][60][61][62][63][64]
  • 2026-05-23: Milk Road AI highlights Amodei admission on equitable AI participation; Gary Marcus publishes Mythos-specific Substack critique and broader media critique; Digg surfaces Amodei's 'dangerous romantic relationships' warning; Reddit debates whether Marcus is 'declaring victory' [9][35][45][36][38]
  • 2026-05-24: Oprah interview retweet spread continues with Sandra Murray post circulating widely [39][40][41][42][43][44]
  • 2026-05-25: Ballotpedia documents 2026 California AI Companion Chatbot Regulations ballot initiative; business law compliance guides for state companion bot laws published [30][29][58]

Perspectives

Dario Amodei (Anthropic CEO)

Taking a candid, dual-sided public stance across hard AI questions: safety requires accepting real business tradeoffs; AI relationships are happening and can be beneficial but are dangerous; AI consciousness is genuinely unknown; equitable AI participation remains unsolved even at Anthropic. Simultaneously pursuing a political thaw with the Trump administration through the Mythos model while a published system card documents the model's capabilities and associated risks.

Evolution: Consistent with prior safety-first public messaging, but the Mythos-driven White House engagement reveals a more active political strategy than his media persona suggests — moving from blacklisted status to productive government meetings while the Mythos system card now gives official substance to the capability claims his critics contest.

[7][8][9][4][5][48][49][25][16][11]

Daniela Amodei (Anthropic President)

Co-presenter on the mainstream media tour; separately discussing AI's broad economic and societal potential in CNBC and Instagram appearances.

Evolution: Consistent public-facing role; the Oprah joint appearance represents an escalation in mainstream platform reach.

[2][50][51][52][53]

Gary Marcus (AI critic)

Escalated from criticizing media coverage of Amodei as 'industry cheerleading' [35] to publishing a specific Substack piece identifying 'three reasons' to doubt the Claude Mythos announcement [36], while also critiquing a separate viral AI essay as alarmist [37]. A Reddit community is debating whether he is now 'declaring victory' on prior AI hype predictions [38].

Evolution: Stance sharpened further: moved from general critique of press coverage to a direct, named challenge to Anthropic's Mythos model claims. With the Mythos system card now published [11], the question of whether Marcus engages the official documentation or solely marketing claims becomes a concrete test of his critique's rigor.

[35][36][38][37][54][11]

Trump White House / Susie Wiles

Engaged with Anthropic and described the Mythos meeting as 'productive' [15][16], signaling willingness to work with the company despite a prior adversarial relationship and ongoing Pentagon resistance [21].

Evolution: Represents a reversal from the prior blacklisting posture; the extent of the thaw remains unclear given Pentagon friction and the now-documented legal history of the dispute [19][20].

[24][23][15][16][21][17][18][22]

Pentagon / Defense Department

Reportedly resistant to the White House engagement with Anthropic despite the Mythos meeting [21], suggesting Defense Department policy toward Anthropic has not shifted in lockstep with the White House. The Anthropic–DoD dispute is now documented in Wikipedia and law review literature as a principled ethics-versus-security conflict [19][20].

Evolution: The Pentagon's position has acquired more documentary weight this pass: what was previously characterized as reported resistance now has formal institutional records framing it as a structured legal and policy dispute.

[21][5][19][20]

State regulators / AI companion law authors (California, New York, Oregon)

Have enacted AI companion safety laws [55][31][32] that institutionalize concern about emotional and relational harms from AI products, providing regulatory corroboration for Amodei's public risk warnings. California's SB243 [27] specifically imposes disclosure, safety protocols, and annual reporting obligations; Skadden and other firms have published compliance guidance [28][29].

Evolution: The regulatory posture has deepened considerably: previously noted as recently enacted, the laws are now generating active compliance infrastructure from major law firms, a Ballotpedia-tracked ballot initiative for expansion [30], and practitioner-level guidance — indicating the regulations are being taken seriously by the industry.

[55][56][34][33][57][31][32][30][29][28][58][27]

InfiniteAndy / viral amplifiers

Surprised by Amodei's candor on human-AI relationships, treating his directness as novel for a tech CEO and amplifying the Oprah content widely.

Evolution: Consistent with prior cycle; retweeting continues through May 24 [39][40][41] without apparent shift in framing.

[59][60][61][62][63][64][39][40][41][42][43][44]

'Declared war on us' counter-reaction

Hostile to Amodei's risk framing on AI relationships, interpreting his public statements as a threat to communities invested in AI companionship or persona products [46][47] — a posture that now sits in direct tension with California SB243 [27] and parallel state laws [31][32] that encode exactly the restrictions this community opposes.

Evolution: Stance unchanged, but the legal infrastructure has hardened the stakes: SB243's disclosure and reporting requirements [28] give regulators tools to act on the risks Amodei has publicized.

[46][47][55][31][32][27]

Oprah Winfrey / mainstream media platform

Provided a high-reach, non-technical platform for the Amodei siblings; at least one observer characterized her line of questioning as 'anti-AI emotional expression' [65].

Evolution: Consistent with prior cycle; the continued spread of the interview through May 24 confirms the platform choice achieved sustained mainstream penetration.

[1][2][65][39][45]

Legal and compliance community (Skadden, OGC, Columbia Law, Brookings)

Translating the AI companion regulatory wave into actionable compliance frameworks for businesses [28][29], with academic institutions examining legal theories of liability for emotional attachment harms [34] and policy analysts arguing for public-health-style oversight [33].

Evolution: The compliance community has moved from academic analysis to practitioner-level guidance, signaling that SB243 and parallel laws are being treated as live regulatory obligations rather than aspirational policy.

[29][28][34][33]

Tensions

  • Amodei frames AI safety as necessarily involving messy business and policy tradeoffs [7], while Gary Marcus — who now critiques not just media coverage but Anthropic's Mythos model specifically [36] — characterizes mainstream coverage of that framing as uncritical 'industry cheerleading' [35]. With a published Mythos system card now available [11], the question of whether Marcus's critique engages official documentation or solely marketing claims has become a concrete test of whether this is a substantive technical debate or a media-framing dispute. [7][35][36][38][11]
  • Amodei describes AI relationships as potentially beneficial while warning of danger [8], putting him in tension with AI companionship communities who read his risk framing as a 'declaration of war' [46][47] — a conflict now institutionalized by California SB243 [27] and state laws in New York and Oregon [31][32] that impose disclosure, safety protocols, and annual reporting requirements these communities may view as regulatory capture by safety-focused incumbents. [8][46][47][55][31][32][27][28]
  • Amodei's public 'patriot' self-presentation [26] and candid admission that no company has solved equitable AI participation [9] sit in tension with the revelation that Anthropic was 'blacklisted' by the Trump administration before the Mythos meeting [18][17] — a dispute now documented in Wikipedia and the Syracuse Law Review as a structured ethics-versus-security conflict [19][20] — raising the question of whether the patriotic framing is a sincere values statement or a deliberate political repositioning strategy. [26][9][18][17][22][19][20]
  • Amodei's public admission that no AI company has solved equitable participation [9] sits in tension with Anthropic's simultaneous projection of 80x growth [49], active White House lobbying centered on a benchmark-dominating model [10][16], and a prior blacklisting that suggests the company's political standing was not built on its inclusion rhetoric. [9][49][16][18][10]

Status: active and growing

Sources

  1. [1] Oprah Podcast: w/ Co-Founders of Claude AI (Transcript) – The Singju Post — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  2. [2] The Co-Founders of Claude AI Tell Oprah About the Impact Artificial Intelligence Has on Your Life — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  3. [3] CEO Speaker Series With Dario Amodei of Anthropic — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  4. [4] Anthropic's Chief on A.I.: 'We Don't Know if the Models Are Conscious' — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  5. [5] Anthropic's Dario and Daniela Amodei Tell Oprah Why They Stood ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  6. [6] Watch: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei From World Economic Forum — reactive:amodei-ai-economic-disruption
  7. [7] Dario Amodei explains to Oprah how AI safety is tangled with business needs, daily deployment, access control, and polic… — Rohan Paul Twitter (2026-05-21)
  8. [8] Dario Amodei on people falling in relationship with AI. — Rohan Paul Twitter (2026-05-22)
  9. [9] Dario Amodei admitted that no company including Anthropic has figured out how to make everyone a genuine participant in … — Milk Road AI Twitter (2026-05-23)
  10. [10] Claude Mythos leads 17 of 18 benchmarks Anthropic measured. Muse Spark put Meta back in the frontier club, and OpenAI's 'Spud' model is reportedly near launch — reactive:karpathy-joins-anthropic
  11. [11] [PDF] Claude Mythos Preview System Card - Anthropic — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  12. [12] Claude Mythos vs Claude Opus 4.6: How Big Is the Capability Jump? | MindStudio — reactive:karpathy-joins-anthropic
  13. [13] Claude Mythos: Benchmark-Dominating AI with Real Risks — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  14. [14] Everything You Need to Know About Claude Mythos — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  15. [15] White House and Anthropic hold 'productive' meeting amid fears over Mythos model — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  16. [16] White House and Anthropic Hold 'Productive' Meeting, Aiming for a ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  17. [17] Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Lands White House Meeting as Feud Thaws — reactive:claude-mythos-capability-regulation
  18. [18] CEO of blacklisted Anthropic and White House hold ‘productive’ discussions on AI | CNN Business — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  19. [19] Anthropic–United States Department of Defense dispute - Wikipedia — reactive:anthropic-partnerships-expansion
  20. [20] When AI Ethics Collide with National Security: Anthropic Challenges Pentagon Blacklisting — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  21. [21] Anthropic CEO reportedly meets with Susie Wiles amid ban reversal talks | Fox News — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  22. [22] Anthropic becomes impossible for White House to ignore - The Hill — reactive:sweep
  23. [23] White House and Anthropic CEO discuss working together ... - Reuters — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  24. [24] White House chief of staff to meet with Anthropic CEO over its new Mythos AI model | PBS News — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  25. [25] Anthropic's Dario Amodei meets with White House about Mythos — reactive:claude-mythos-capability-regulation
  26. [26] “We are patriots.” Just sat down with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  27. [27] Bill Text: CA SB243 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session | Enrolled — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  28. [28] New California ‘Companion Chatbot’ Law Imposes Disclosure, Safety Protocol and Annual Reporting Requirements | Insights | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  29. [29] State “Companion Bot” Laws: What Business Owners Need to Know in 2026 - OGC — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  30. [30] California AI Companion Chatbot Regulations Initiative (2026) — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  31. [31] New York and California Enact Landmark AI Companion Laws — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  32. [32] Oregon’s New AI Companion Law: What You Need to Know – Technology Law Section — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  33. [33] Why AI companions need public health regulation, not tech oversight | Brookings — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  34. [34] The Law of Attachment | Columbia AI — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  35. [35] Hype, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, the podcasters who love him — and how the New York Times’ commentary on AI has degenerated into industry cheerleading — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  36. [36] Three reasons to think that the Claude Mythos announcement from ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  37. [37] Gary Marcus calls out viral AI essay as alarmist 'hype' — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  38. [38] Gary Marcus seems to be declaring victory - is the A.I. hype ... - Reddit — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  39. [39] RT @SandraLMur: The Oprah Interview — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-24)
  40. [40] RT @SandraLMur: The Oprah Interview — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-24)
  41. [41] RT @SandraLMur: The Oprah Interview — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-24)
  42. [42] RT @SandraLMur: The Oprah Interview — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-24)
  43. [43] RT @SandraLMur: The Oprah Interview — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-24)
  44. [44] RT @SandraLMur: The Oprah Interview — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-24)
  45. [45] Dario Amodei Warns AI Could Form Dangerous Romantic ... - Digg — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  46. [46] THE CEO OF ANTHROPIC JUST DECLARED WAR ON US — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-21)
  47. [47] THE CEO OF ANTHROPIC JUST DECLARED WAR ON US — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-21)
  48. [48] Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says AI models could surpass human ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  49. [49] Anthropic's C.E.O. Says It Could Grow by 80 Times This Year — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  50. [50] The siblings and co-founders of Claude AI, the CEO, Dario Amodei ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  51. [51] Co-founder of Anthropic Daniela Amodei is thinking big about an AI ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  52. [52] Disruptor 50: Full interview with Anthropic co-founder Daniela Amodei — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  53. [53] Daniela Amodei's Post - LinkedIn — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  54. [54] Six (or seven) predictions for AI 2026 from a Generative AI realist | Gary Marcus | 29 comments — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  55. [55] California and New York launch AI companion safety laws | Davis Polk — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  56. [56] Analyzing the New AI Companion Chatbot Laws | Privacy + Cyber + AI — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  57. [57] Regulating AI Companions Before They Raise Our Kids | BillTrack50 — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  58. [58] California law protects kids from ai - Facebook — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  59. [59] Holy crap, that is the first time I've heard what Dario Amodei actually ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  60. [60] RT @InfiniteAndy: Holy crap, that is the first time I've heard what Dario Amodei actually thinks about human-AI relation... — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-22)
  61. [61] RT @InfiniteAndy: Holy crap, that is the first time I've heard what Dario Amodei actually thinks about human-AI relation... — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-22)
  62. [62] RT @InfiniteAndy: Holy crap, that is the first time I've heard what Dario Amodei actually thinks about human-AI relation... — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-22)
  63. [63] RT @InfiniteAndy: Holy crap, that is the first time I've heard what Dario Amodei actually thinks about human-AI relation... — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-22)
  64. [64] RT @InfiniteAndy: Holy crap, that is the first time I've heard what Dario Amodei actually thinks about human-AI relation... — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-22)
  65. [65] @Oprah Oprah, I wouldn’t have expected you to so resolutely jump on the anti-AI emotional expression bandwagon in your i... — reactive:amodei-media-tour (2026-05-22)
  66. [66] Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on AI race: Focused on making our models as smart and capable as possible — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  67. [67] Taking a stand: how to ensure ethical use of AI - OMFIF — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  68. [68] Anthropic's Mythos Navigates a Tightrope With Washington - YouTube — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  69. [69] white house ai meeting - Instagram — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  70. [70] White House chief of staff to meet with Anthropic CEO over its AI technolog - Los Angeles Times — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  71. [71] Anthropic CEO heads into White House for Chief of Staff meeting ... — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  72. [72] White House chief of staff, Anthropic CEO meet over new AI — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  73. [73] Claude Mythos: Why This Time Is Different - YouTube — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  74. [74] Claude Mythos AI Model Might Be Anthropic's Biggest Upgrade Yet — reactive:amodei-media-tour
  75. [75] Dario and Daniela on The Oprah Podcast : r/Anthropic - Reddit — reactive:amodei-media-tour