The Information Machine

Frontier AI Offensive Cybersecurity Benchmarks: GPT-5.5 vs. Claude Mythos

cooling · v14 · 2026-05-11 · 255 items · history

What

Two frontier AI models — Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview and OpenAI's GPT-5.5 — have been formally evaluated by the UK AI Security Institute and found to represent a new capability tier in autonomous offensive cybersecurity, with GPT-5.5 becoming the second model to autonomously complete a 32-step corporate network attack simulation.[2][3] A parallel naming dispute runs through coverage: OpenAI's restricted cybersecurity product is GPT-5.4-Cyber, a derivative of the earlier GPT-5.4 family, not 'GPT-5.5-Cyber' as Cointelegraph and TechCrunch report — confirmed by OpenAI's own documentation, Wikipedia, and user comparisons.[22][20][16][15] The institutional response ecosystem has expanded from AISI evaluations through CSA guidance[32] and CrowdStrike operational recommendations[36] to commercial vendor product pitches,[35] while XBOW argues the broader GPT-5.5 general release already delivers comparable offensive capability to anyone with API access, regardless of model-specific access controls.[41][42]

Why it matters

Two competing frontier AI labs have independently demonstrated autonomous end-to-end cyberattack capability at superhuman speed and near-zero marginal cost,[9] compressing the exploit window in ways security operations were not designed to handle. The convergence of AISI benchmarks, enterprise surveys showing 62% of organizations say security concerns block agentic AI scaling,[40] and commercial vendors now actively selling against the threat signals a transition from theoretical risk to operational urgency — without a coordinated international governance response in place.

Open questions

  • Will OpenAI issue an explicit official clarification naming GPT-5.4 (not GPT-5.5) as the base model for its Cyber variant, closing the naming ambiguity that Cointelegraph and TechCrunch continue to propagate?[25][26][22]

  • Does XBOW's finding that unrestricted GPT-5.5 already delivers Mythos-class offensive capabilities[41][42] mean model-level access gating under programs like Trusted Access for Cyber is effectively hollow — and if so, what access-control mechanisms could actually reduce offensive uplift?

  • Will David Sacks's public engagement with Mythos[52] translate into formal US government policy guidance or evaluation frameworks for frontier AI cyber risks, or remain low-substance amplification?

  • Can the practitioner-media 'before August' SOC response deadline[39] be traced to a specific regulatory or institutional trigger, or does it reflect editorial urgency framing independent of any official guidance?

Narrative

The UK AI Security Institute (AISI) sits at the center of this story as the primary independent evaluator of frontier model cyber capabilities. In early April 2026, AISI published its evaluation of Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview, establishing it as the first AI model to autonomously complete a 32-step simulated corporate network attack end-to-end.[1] On April 30, AISI evaluated OpenAI's GPT-5.5, finding it achieved a 71.4% average pass rate on expert-level cybersecurity tasks — ahead of GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.7 — and completed the same 32-step network attack simulation in 2 of 10 attempts, making GPT-5.5 'the second model to autonomously complete a full network attack simulation.'[2][3] Multiple independent benchmarks report GPT-5.5 narrowly tops or statistically ties Claude Mythos Preview on Terminal Bench 2.0,[4][5][6][7][8] and social media commentators across languages describe the convergence as evidence that two leading labs have independently crossed the same capability threshold within weeks of each other.[9][10][11][12]

A persistent naming dispute runs through coverage of OpenAI's cybersecurity product. The model restricted to vetted defenders under OpenAI's 'Trusted Access for Cyber' program is GPT-5.4-Cyber — a fine-tuned variant of the earlier GPT-5.4 model family, not GPT-5.5.[13][14][15] Reuters, CNET, Forbes, CyberScoop, and The Hacker News consistently use the 'GPT-5.4-Cyber' designation;[16][17][18][15][19] OpenAI's own system card, API documentation, and Help Center confirm GPT-5.4 as a distinct model family;[13][14][20] Vice, Wikipedia, YouTube hands-on reviews, and Reddit user comparisons further confirm the GPT-5.4/5.5 architectural separation.[21][22][23][24] Cointelegraph and TechCrunch (via Facebook) remain outliers using 'GPT-5.5-Cyber,'[25][26] but the weight of official documentation, encyclopedic, editorial, and user-experience evidence makes the 5.4-Cyber designation the correct one. OpenAI has not issued an explicit official statement naming GPT-5.4 as the Cyber variant's base model, leaving a residual gap in the public record.

The institutional and commercial response has been substantial and layered. Anthropic published a risk report and system card for Mythos Preview and named CrowdStrike as its founding security partner.[27][28] OpenAI launched 'Trusted Access for Cyber' with multi-tiered restricted access and subsequently announced further expansion,[29][30] while The Verge frames the program as limited to 'critical cyber defenders' only.[31] The Cloud Security Alliance has published iterative PDF guidance — 'The AI Vulnerability Storm: Building a Mythos-ready Security Program'[32][33] — and a CSA Labs technical document on Mythos vulnerability discovery and containment failures.[34] Zscaler has published a commercial response framing CSA's recommendation of deception technology as something 'on every CISO's 90-day plan,'[35] the first instance of a major security vendor converting CSA's institutional Mythos guidance into a direct product pitch. CrowdStrike calls on defenders to abandon backlog-based patching given frontier AI's compression of the exploit window.[36] IBM announced autonomous security measures to counter frontier AI-driven threats,[37] Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 published a defenders' guide,[38] and a cybersecurity intelligence piece has independently set 'before August' as a SOC response deadline.[39] The Stanford HAI 2026 AI Index found 62% of enterprise respondents say security concerns block agentic AI scaling,[40] providing quantitative evidence that the governance gap is being experienced operationally, not just flagged theoretically.

Several counter-voices complicate the dominant threat-escalation narrative. XBOW, the offensive security firm, argues that unrestricted GPT-5.5 already delivers Mythos-class offensive capabilities to anyone with API access, making model-level access gating structurally incomplete.[41][42] CSIS published 'Beyond Autonomous Attacks: The Reality of AI-Enabled Cyber Threats' as an explicit corrective to overstated autonomous-attack narratives,[43] and WIRED offered a qualified counterpoint that Mythos' cybersecurity reckoning may not be the one practitioners expect.[44] Alberto Romero's 'Why You Can't Trust Anthropic Anymore' attacks Anthropic's institutional credibility on model safety claims,[45] and Hacker News commentary surfaced an OpenAI hypocrisy narrative: having criticized Anthropic for gating Mythos, OpenAI then applied its own access restrictions under Trusted Access for Cyber.[46] OECD.AI has catalogued the frontier AI cyber capability development as a formal international AI incident,[47] and national cyber agencies from the UK, Australia, Canada, and Singapore have published advisories,[48][49][50][51] yet no coordinated international access-control framework has emerged.

Timeline

  • 2026-04-01: UK AISI publishes evaluation of Claude Mythos Preview's cyber capabilities, establishing Mythos as the first model to autonomously complete a 32-step corporate network attack simulation [1]
  • 2026-04-01: Anthropic publishes Claude Mythos Preview alignment risk report and system card; CrowdStrike named as founding security partner [27][28][92]
  • 2026-04-07: New York Times publishes 'Anthropic Claims Its New A.I. Model, Mythos, Is a Cybersecurity Reckoning'; Reddit r/cybersecurity opens dedicated Mythos launch discussion thread [191][192]
  • 2026-04-13: Cloud Security Alliance circulates early draft of 'The AI Vulnerability Storm: Building a Mythos-ready Security Program' PDF guidance document [113]
  • 2026-04-14: Reuters reports OpenAI unveils GPT-5.4-Cyber 'a week after rival's announcement'; Reddit thread breaks the restricted rollout news; Axios and Simon Willison publish commentary on 'Trusted Access for the next era of cyber defense'; The Hacker News covers the launch using the GPT-5.4-Cyber designation [16][193][82][84][19]
  • 2026-04-15: IBM announces new autonomous security measures to help enterprises confront agentic AI-driven attacks [37][111]
  • 2026-04-16: Forbes publishes 'OpenAI's New GPT-5.4-Cyber Raises The Stakes For AI And Security'; CNET, TrendingTopics, and Penligent.ai publish using the 5.4 designation [18][17][86][155][88]
  • 2026-04-20: OECD.AI formally catalogs the frontier AI cyber capability jump as an incident in its international AI incident registry [47]
  • 2026-04-24: Early social media debate emerges over whether Mythos or GPT-5.5 leads on the AISI cyber benchmark [194]
  • 2026-04-30: UK AISI publishes formal evaluation of GPT-5.5 cyber capabilities: 71.4% pass rate on expert-level cyber tasks, 2 of 10 attempts completing the 32-step corporate network attack simulation; explicitly describes GPT-5.5 as 'the second model to autonomously complete a full network attack simulation,' confirming Mythos as first [2][53][54][3][10][151][56][57][58][60]
  • 2026-04-30: VentureBeat, Moccet AI, Bytex Technologies, Ars Technica, and The Decoder report GPT-5.5 'narrowly tops' or matches Claude Mythos Preview on Terminal Bench 2.0; Yahoo Tech and Ground News report parity finding; Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard accessible via tbench.ai and LLM-Stats; BenchLM publishes head-to-head comparison [4][7][8][162][5][6][182][195][99][103][196][104][105][61][62]
  • 2026-04-30: OpenAI officially introduces GPT-5.5 and launches 'Trusted Access for Cyber' portal; Cointelegraph and TechCrunch (via Facebook) use 'GPT-5.5-Cyber' while Reuters, CNET, Forbes, The Hacker News, and specialist outlets use 'GPT-5.4-Cyber'; OpenAI's own GPT-5.4 system card, API docs, and mini/nano announcement confirm GPT-5.4 as a distinct model family; Vice, Wikipedia, YouTube hands-on reviews, OpenAI Help Center, and Reddit users further confirm the GPT-5.4/5.5 architectural distinction [66][29][67][68][69][70][71][73][72][75][78][76][77][190][15][85][185][184][17][16][19][18][86][25][26][13][14][87][21][22][23][20][89][24]
  • 2026-04-30: XBOW publishes 'GPT-5.5: Mythos-Like Hacking, Open To All' and 'GPT-5.5: Democratizing Cyber Capabilities'; WIRED publishes comparative Mythos vs. GPT-5.5 analysis; The Verge covers OpenAI security model as for 'critical cyber defenders' only; Rohan Paul amplifies parity narrative citing near-zero-cost autonomous attack chains [41][97][98][197][198][199][185][42][99][100][101][102][31][9][52]
  • 2026-04-30: WIRED publishes 'Anthropic's Mythos Will Force a Cybersecurity Reckoning—Just Not the One You Think,' signaling a qualified counter-narrative in prestige tech journalism [44]
  • 2026-04-30: Cloud Security Alliance publishes updated PDF guidance and new CSA Labs technical document 'Claude Mythos: AI Vulnerability Discovery and Containment Failures'; CSIS publishes 'Beyond Autonomous Attacks: The Reality of AI-Enabled Cyber Threats'; CSA PDF directly accessible and amplified via LinkedIn [33][114][43][152][200][201][34][32][120]
  • 2026-04-30: OpenAI announces expansion of Trusted Access for Cyber with additional tiers; CrowdStrike publishes 'How Defenders Must Respond to Frontier AI' with specific 'abandon backlog-based patching' recommendation; Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 publishes 'Frontier AI and the Future of Defense' [30][81][36][38][106][107][108][109]
  • 2026-05-01: Story spreads to Spanish and Portuguese social media; BSCN and other accounts amplify the AISI 'GPT-5.5 matches Mythos' finding internationally; Threads/@therundownai summarizes AISI findings with precise quantitative data; Reddit r/codex and r/accelerate threads open on GPT-5.5 network simulation milestone [163][12][202][11][164][165][154][59][60][64][65]
  • 2026-05-02: Hacker News thread surfaces OpenAI hypocrisy narrative; Alberto Romero's 'Why You Can't Trust Anthropic Anymore' publishes; CSIS counter-narrative amplified to LinkedIn via Cyber News Live; Stanford HAI 2026 AI Index 'Responsible AI' section and Oxford AIGI 'Open Problems in Frontier AI Risk Management' add to academic governance framework [46][45][93][121][177][178][138][139][142][140][141][127]
  • 2026-05-03: Zscaler publishes commercial response to CSA's Mythos guidance recommending deception technology as a CISO 90-day priority; cybersecurity intelligence piece frames 'before August' as SOC response deadline; Reddit r/singularity opens dedicated AISI-Mythos findings thread; Stanford HAI 2026 AI Index generates second coverage wave including 62% security-blocks-agentic-AI finding [35][39][63][40][144][146][147][148][149][150][145][143]

Perspectives

UK AI Security Institute (AISI)

Neutral independent evaluator: GPT-5.5 comparable to Claude Mythos Preview on cybersecurity benchmarks with 71.4% pass rate on expert-level tasks; 2 of 10 attempts completing the 32-step corporate network attack simulation; explicitly describes GPT-5.5 as 'the second model to autonomously complete a full network attack simulation,' confirming Mythos as the first; both models represent a new capability tier

Evolution: Consistent; AISI findings have now generated active threads across at least five distinct Reddit subcommunities including r/cybersecurity, r/singularity, r/codex, r/accelerate, and r/NowInCyber

[2][1][53][54][3][10][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65]

OpenAI

Proactively defensive with product differentiation: multi-tiered 'Trusted Access for Cyber' program restricts GPT-5.4-Cyber while general GPT-5.5 remains public; Sam Altman personally promoting the rollout and announcing further expansion; own documentation confirms GPT-5.4 as a distinct model family from GPT-5.5

Evolution: GPT-5.4/5.5 taxonomy is now confirmed across every information layer — official documentation, Help Center, encyclopedic (Wikipedia), editorial (Vice), and user-experience reports (Reddit). The architecture question is effectively resolved; the only remaining gap is the absence of an explicit official statement naming GPT-5.4 as the Cyber variant's base model

[66][29][67][68][30][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][46][84][85][17][16][19][18][86][25][26][13][14][87][88][21][22][23][20][89][24]

Anthropic

Cautious-defensive: Mythos remains gated; risk report and system card published; CrowdStrike partnership signals enterprise security positioning; facing reputational pressure from Alberto Romero's trust critique; practitioner media now setting its own 'before August' urgency timelines independent of Anthropic communications

Evolution: Consistent from Anthropic itself; the urgency narrative around Mythos has partially escaped Anthropic's control as practitioner media independently frames response deadlines

[90][91][27][28][92][45][93][94][95][96][34][39]

XBOW (security firm)

Alarmed but framing as democratization: GPT-5.5 brings Mythos-class offensive hacking capability to the general public regardless of GPT-5.4-Cyber's gating; any model-level gating is structurally incomplete given GPT-5.5's unrestricted availability

Evolution: Consistent; XBOW's framing has been amplified by The New Stack, LinkedIn professionals, and Reddit r/singularity

[41][97][98][42][99][100][101][102][103][104][105]

CrowdStrike

'Frontier AI is collapsing the exploit window to near-zero; security teams must abandon backlog-based patching and adopt real-time response posture'

Evolution: Consistent; no new statements

[27][28][36][106][107][108][109]

Palo Alto Networks Unit 42

'Frontier AI and the Future of Defense: Your Top Questions Answered' frames frontier AI as a defense challenge requiring updated security posture

Evolution: Consistent; no new statements

[38][110]

IBM

Announcing new autonomous security measures to help enterprises confront frontier AI-driven agentic cyber attacks

Evolution: Consistent; no new statements

[37][111]

Cloud Security Alliance

Formally engaged and escalating toward model-specific technical analysis: iterative PDF guidance 'The AI Vulnerability Storm: Building a Mythos-ready Security Program' plus CSA Labs technical document 'Claude Mythos: AI Vulnerability Discovery and Containment Failures' represent the deepest institutional technical engagement with Mythos risks to date

Evolution: CSA's PDF guidance is now directly accessible and driving downstream commercial action: Zscaler has published a dedicated vendor response and LinkedIn professionals have amplified it. CSA guidance has crossed the threshold from institutional document to commercial sales enablement material

[112][33][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][34][120][32][35]

Zscaler

Commercial translation of CSA's Mythos guidance: 'The CSA just put deception on every CISO's 90-day plan' — framing CSA's institutional recommendation as a specific commercial security posture requiring deception technology deployment

Evolution: Consistent since first appearing last pass as the first major vendor converting CSA institutional guidance into direct product framing

[35]

CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies)

Skeptical counter-framing: 'Beyond Autonomous Attacks: The Reality of AI-Enabled Cyber Threats' positions itself as corrective to overstated autonomous-attack narratives

Evolution: Consistent; being amplified through LinkedIn professional networks, widening the audience for institutional skepticism

[43][121][122]

OECD.AI and international policy bodies

International policy recognition and systematic documentation: OECD.AI catalogued the frontier AI cyber capability jump as an AI incident; national cyber agencies from the UK, Australia, Canada, and Singapore have published advisories

Evolution: Consistent; no new statements

[47][123][124][125][126][127][48][49][50][51]

Stanford HAI and academic governance framework

Systematic institutional framing of frontier AI risks including cyber capabilities; 2026 AI Index covers technical performance, policy and governance, and responsible AI; key finding: 62% of respondents say security concerns block agentic AI scaling

Evolution: Consistent; the 62% finding remains the most significant quantitative data point grounding the governance gap in measurable enterprise operational experience

[128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][40][145][146][147][148][149][150]

Reuters, CNET, Forbes, The Hacker News, and specialist security trade press

Predominantly converged on 'GPT-5.4-Cyber' as the correct product designation; Cointelegraph and TechCrunch (Facebook) remain outliers using 'GPT-5.5-Cyber'

Evolution: The 5.4/5.5 distinction is now confirmed from below through Reddit user-experience comparisons and Wikipedia's encyclopedic formalization, further validating specialist press consensus

[4][151][7][8][152][153][154][5][6][15][17][16][19][18][86][155][25][26][13][14][87][88][21][22][20][89][24]

Alberto Romero / The Algorithmic Bridge

Critical AI methodology skeptic: 'Why You Can't Trust Anthropic Anymore' attacks Anthropic's credibility; adjacent pieces reveal broader skepticism about AI company claims and study design

Evolution: Consistent; no new statements

[45][94][95][156][157][158][96][159][160][161]

Rohan Paul (social media amplifier)

Alarm amplification: 'Frontier AI can now autonomously chain complex, expert-level cyber attacks end-to-end, at superhuman speed and near-zero marginal cost'; GPT-5.5 and Mythos Preview are 'statistically tied — both far ahead of earlier models'

Evolution: New amplifier voice; also flagged David Sacks publicly engaging with Mythos, though without substantive policy content

[9][52]

Social media commentators and podcast audiences (multilingual)

Amplification spread globally; tone consolidating around the settled parity narrative; Reddit threads active across at least five subcommunities

Evolution: Community penetration now confirmed across r/cybersecurity, r/singularity, r/codex, r/accelerate, and r/NowInCyber, extending practitioner and enthusiast discussion to a widening audience base

[162][163][12][11][164][165][10][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176][85][59][177][60][178][179][63][180][64][65][181]

Tensions

  • AISI 'statistical tie' top-line vs. converging multi-outlet Terminal Bench 2.0 edge: AISI calls the models comparable (71.4% pass rate; 2 of 10 simulation attempts completed), but VentureBeat, Moccet AI, Bytex Technologies, Ars Technica, and The Decoder all report a narrow GPT-5.5 win or match on Terminal Bench 2.0; the 'second model' framing explicitly confirms Mythos was first to complete a full network attack simulation autonomously, suggesting the tie framing masks a temporal and task-specific Mythos priority [4][7][8][162][3][10][53][151][55][56][5][6][57][182][103][104][105][60]
  • OpenAI hypocrisy: having criticized Anthropic for gating Mythos, OpenAI then restricted access to its own GPT-5.4-Cyber variant under 'Trusted Access for Cyber'; XBOW's 'democratizing' framing adds a structural irony, arguing that unrestricted GPT-5.5 already delivers Mythos-class offensive capabilities regardless of GPT-5.4-Cyber's gating, rendering any model-level restriction partially hollow [29][67][183][30][98][41][72][73][83][46][42][101][102]
  • GPT-5.4-Cyber vs. GPT-5.5-Cyber naming: Cointelegraph and TechCrunch/Facebook continue using 'GPT-5.5-Cyber' against an overwhelming weight of evidence for 'GPT-5.4-Cyber' — OpenAI's own documentation, Help Center, Vice, Wikipedia, YouTube hands-on reviews, and Reddit user comparisons all confirm the architectural separation — but OpenAI has still not issued an explicit official clarification naming the Cyber variant's base model [75][76][70][77][82][15][184][185][17][16][19][18][86][155][25][26][13][14][87][88][21][22][20][89][24]
  • Whether benchmark performance translates to real-world offensive uplift: CSIS's 'Beyond Autonomous Attacks' explicitly frames itself as corrective to overstated autonomous-attack narratives; WIRED's 'just not the one you think' framing also qualifies the reckoning narrative; both remain minority counter-currents against the dominant discourse treating AISI benchmark scores as proxies for operational threat capability [43][121][186][187][188][189][44][127]
  • Anthropic's institutional credibility and trust: Alberto Romero's 'Why You Can't Trust Anthropic Anymore' attacks Anthropic's credibility on safety claims; CSA Labs' Mythos vulnerability document adds institutional technical scrutiny; practitioner media now setting its own 'before August' response deadlines independent of anything Anthropic has communicated, suggesting the urgency narrative has partially escaped Anthropic's control [45][93][96][159][95][34][39]
  • Regulatory and governance gap vs. enterprise operational experience: 62% of enterprises say security concerns block agentic AI scaling (Stanford HAI via Kiteworks), OECD.AI has catalogued this as an international AI incident, CSA is producing iterative guidance — but no coordinated international access-control framework exists; voluntary gating contrasts with the structural reality that unrestricted GPT-5.5 may already deliver Mythos-class offensive capability regardless of gating decisions [47][123][124][48][49][50][51][31][112][33][29][125][126][42][140][141][40]
  • Commercial monetization of institutional security guidance: Zscaler's response to CSA's deception technology recommendation introduces a fault line — CSA's institutionally-framed Mythos guidance is being converted into commercial vendor product pitches, raising questions about whether commercial incentives will amplify, distort, or selectively emphasize the risk signals CSA intended to convey [35][120][32][33][113]
  • Program scope ambiguity: OpenAI's own materials frame GPT-5.4-Cyber as for 'critical infrastructure defenders' and government partners, but third-party coverage describes ambitions to deploy 'at all levels of government to fight hackers'; Sam Altman's announced further expansion adds executive momentum without clarifying eligibility boundaries [74][29][76][82][181][190][15][177][31]

Status: active and growing

Sources

  1. [1] Our evaluation of Claude Mythos Preview's cyber capabilities — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  2. [2] Our evaluation of OpenAI's GPT-5.5 cyber capabilities | AISI Work — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  3. [3] On our narrow cyber tasks, GPT-5.5 achieved a — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  4. [4] OpenAI's GPT-5.5 is here, and it's no potato - VentureBeat — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  5. [5] Amid Mythos' hyped cybersecurity prowess, researchers find GPT-5.5 ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  6. [6] GPT-5.5 matches Claude Mythos in cyber attack tests, UK AI Security ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  7. [7] GPT-5.5 Arrives: OpenAI Narrowly Tops Claude Mythos Preview on Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Moccet Tech News — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  8. [8] GPT-5.5 Shows Marginal Lead Over Mythos on Terminal Bench 2.0 | Bytex Technologies — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  9. [9] Frontier AI can now autonomously chain complex, expert-level cyber attacks end-to-end, at superhuman speed and near-zero… — Rohan Paul Twitter (2026-04-30)
  10. [10] GPT-5.5 hit parity with Claude Mythos on offensive cyber evals. UK AI Security Institute confirmed 71.4% pass rate on mu... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  11. [11] UK AISI: GPT-5.5 MATCHES MYTHOS ON CYBER TASKS — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  12. [12] 🔍🚨 Evaluación del UK AI Security Institute revela que GPT-5.5 iguala a Claude Mythos en capacidades cibernéticas. — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  13. [13] GPT-5.4 Thinking System Card | OpenAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  14. [14] GPT-5.4 Model | OpenAI API — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  15. [15] OpenAI expands Trusted Access for Cyber program with new GPT 5.4 Cyber model  | CyberScoop — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  16. [16] OpenAI unveils GPT-5.4-Cyber a week after rival's ... - Reuters — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  17. [17] OpenAI Has a New GPT-5.4-Cyber Model. Here's Why You ... - CNET — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  18. [18] OpenAI's New GPT-5.4-Cyber Raises The Stakes For AI And Security — reactive:openai-advanced-account-security
  19. [19] OpenAI Launches GPT-5.4-Cyber with Expanded Access for ... — reactive:openai-advanced-account-security
  20. [20] GPT-5.3 and GPT-5.5 in ChatGPT | OpenAI Help Center — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  21. [21] Everything We Know About OpenAI's New GPT-5.4 Thinking Model — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  22. [22] GPT-5.4 - Wikipedia — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  23. [23] GPT-5.4 Is HERE – Hands-On With OpenAI's Newest Model! — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  24. [24] GPT 5.5 is way better than GPT 5.4 for UI/Frontend specific tasks : r/OpenAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  25. [25] OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announces the rollout of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  26. [26] OpenAI will begin rolling out it cybersecurity testing tool, GPT-5.5 ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  27. [27] [PDF] Alignment Risk Update: Claude Mythos Preview - Anthropic — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  28. [28] Anthropic Claude Mythos Preview - CrowdStrike — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  29. [29] Introducing Trusted Access for Cyber | OpenAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  30. [30] We're expanding Trusted Access for Cyber with additional tiers for ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  31. [31] OpenAI's new security model is for 'critical cyber defenders' only — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  32. [32] [PDF] The “AI Vulnerability Storm”: Building a “Mythos- ready” Security ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  33. [33] [PDF] The “AI Vulnerability Storm”: Building a “Mythos- ready” Security Program — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  34. [34] Claude Mythos: AI Vulnerability Discovery and Containment Failures — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  35. [35] The CSA Just Put Deception on Every CISO's 90-Day Plan. Here's Why. | Zscaler — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  36. [36] How Defenders Must Respond to Frontier AI | CrowdStrike — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  37. [37] IBM Announces New Cybersecurity Measures to Help Enterprises ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  38. [38] Frontier AI and the Future of Defense: Your Top Questions Answered — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  39. [39] Claude Mythos Preview Redraws the Vulnerability Discovery Th — Cybersecurity Intelligence — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  40. [40] Stanford AI Index 2026: Why 62% Say Security Blocks Agentic AI Scaling — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  41. [41] XBOW - GPT-5.5: Mythos-Like Hacking, Open To All — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  42. [42] XBOW - GPT-5.5: Democratizing Cyber Capabilities — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  43. [43] Beyond Autonomous Attacks: The Reality of AI-Enabled Cyber Threats | Strategic Technologies Blog | CSIS — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  44. [44] Anthropic’s Mythos Will Force a Cybersecurity Reckoning—Just Not the One You Think | WIRED — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  45. [45] Why You Can’t Trust Anthropic Anymore - by Alberto Romero — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  46. [46] After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  47. [47] Frontier AI Models Accelerate Cyberattack Capabilities - OECD.AI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  48. [48] Why cyber defenders need to be ready for frontier AI | National Cyber Security Centre — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  49. [49] Frontier AI models and their impact on cyber security | Cyber.gov.au — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  50. [50] Frontier artificial intelligence - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  51. [51] Advisory on Risks associated with Frontier AI Models | Cyber Security Agency of Singapore — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  52. [52] David Sacks demystifying Anthropic's Mythos 👀 https://t.co/zQ0AbkuBGb https://t.co/jKM7Q4BfU4 — Rohan Paul Twitter (2026-04-30)
  53. [53] Our evaluation of OpenAI's GPT-5.5 cyber capabilities — Simon Willison (2026-04-30)
  54. [54] Read our full evaluation: — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  55. [55] UK AISI Says GPT-5.5 Is One of the Strongest Cyber Models It Has ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  56. [56] Read our full evaluation: — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  57. [57] UK AI Security Institute says GPT-5.5 is the second model to autonomously complete a full network attack simulation, mat... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-02)
  58. [58] GPT-5.5 Rivals Claude Mythos in Cyberattack Simulations, UK AI Security Institute Reports — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-02)
  59. [59] The UK AISI evaluation says GPT-5.5 is one of the strongest models ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  60. [60] AI models are starting to cross a new line in cybersecurity. UK AISI just tested OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 and found it reached a similar cyber performance level to Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview. On expert-level cyber tasks, GPT-5.5 scored a 71.4% average pass rate, ahead of GPT-5.4 and Opus 4.7. It also completed AISI’s 32-step corporate network attack simulation in 2 out of 10 attempts. That made GPT-5.5 only the second model AISI has seen solve the full attack chain end-to-end. — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  61. [61] OpenAI's GPT-5.5 Matches Claude Mythos in Cyberattack Capabilities — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  62. [62] GPT-5.5 Matches Heavily Hyped Mythos Preview In New Cybersecurity Tests — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  63. [63] AI Security Institute Findings on Claude Mythos Preview : r/singularity — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  64. [64] GPT-5.5 becomes the second model after Claude Mythos Preview to ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  65. [65] GPT-5.5 becomes the second model after Claude Mythos Preview to ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  66. [66] Introducing GPT-5.5 - OpenAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  67. [67] OpenAI Expands Trusted Access Program With GPT-5.5-Cyber - Dataconomy — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  68. [68] OpenAI’s Sam Altman says GPT-5.5-Cyber to launch for cyber defenders with focus on trusted government access | Today News — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  69. [69] Accelerating the cyber defense ecosystem that protects us all - OpenAI — reactive:openai-advanced-account-security
  70. [70] we're starting rollout of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a frontier cybersecurity ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  71. [71] Sam Altman announced GPT-5.5-Cyber on April 30, 2026 — a frontier cybersecurity model deploying to vetted defenders with... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-04-30)
  72. [72] Request OpenAI Pilot: Trusted Access For Cyber — reactive:openai-advanced-account-security
  73. [73] Trusted access for the next era of cyber defense - OpenAI — reactive:openai-advanced-account-security
  74. [74] OpenAI wants to put its most powerful model at all levels of government to fight hackers | Business | kten.com — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  75. [75] OpenAI Launches GPT-5.4-Cyber, Expands Trusted Access Program as AI Defense Race Heats Up — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  76. [76] OpenAI prepares GPT-5.5-Cyber for trusted security researchers - Techzine Global — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  77. [77] OpenAI to roll out GPT-5.5-Cyber with restricted access: Sam Altman — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  78. [78] Sam Altman reveals GPT-5.5-Cyber model launch with new AI defence strategy — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  79. [79] OpenAI will roll out GPT-5.5-Cyber to critical cyber defenders, CEO ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  80. [80] Jonathan R.'s Post - LinkedIn — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  81. [81] Introducing Trusted Access for Cyber | Ilya Kabanov | 39 comments — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  82. [82] OpenAI rolls out tiered access to advanced AI cyber models - Axios — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  83. [83] with OpenAI's critique of "a model where frontier cyber capabilities ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  84. [84] Trusted access for the next era of cyber defense — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  85. [85] OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announces the rollout of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  86. [86] GPT-5.4-Cyber: OpenAI Introduces AI Model for Cyber Defense to Counter Anthropic — reactive:openai-advanced-account-security
  87. [87] Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano - OpenAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  88. [88] GPT-5.4-Cyber, Trusted Access for Cyber — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  89. [89] GPT-5.4 Is Here — And It's Not Just Another Model Update - Medium — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  90. [90] Assessing Claude Mythos Preview's cybersecurity capabilities — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  91. [91] Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era - Anthropic — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  92. [92] [PDF] Claude Mythos Preview System Card - Anthropic — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  93. [93] Is Anthropics decline strengthening OpenAI? - Facebook — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  94. [94] The Algorithmic Bridge | Alberto Romero | Substack — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  95. [95] Alberto Romero (@thealgorithmicbridge): " Anthropic: we can't ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  96. [96] Why You Can't Trust Most AI Studies - The Algorithmic Bridge — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  97. [97] “Mythos-like hacking, open to all”: Industry reacts to OpenAI's GPT 5.5 — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  98. [98] GPT-5.5 Brings Mythos-Like Hacking to the Masses | Awesome Agents — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  99. [99] Pen-Testing Company XBOW on GPT-5.5: Mythos-like Cyber-Sec — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  100. [100] GPT 5.5 Boosts XBOW Pentest Performance | Steve Katasi posted ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  101. [101] Albert Ziegler - GPT-5.5: Mythos-Like Hacking, Open To All - LinkedIn — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  102. [102] Accessible, adept AI ✔️ XBOW tested GPT 5.5, and it's a game ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  103. [103] terminal-bench@2.0 Leaderboard — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  104. [104] GPT-5.5 Benchmarks, Pricing & Context Window - LLM Stats — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  105. [105] Claude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.5: AI Benchmark Comparison 2026 — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  106. [106] Frontier AI Shrinks the Exploit Window to Near-Zero: Securit — Cybersecurity Intelligence — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  107. [107] Frontier AI Collapsing Exploit Window, Security Teams Must Adapt — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  108. [108] Preparing for Frontier AI with CrowdStrike | Tony Bergen posted on ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  109. [109] Frontier AI Security Readiness Requirements | CrowdStrike — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  110. [110] Defender's Guide to the Frontier AI Impact on Cybersecurity — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  111. [111] IBM Introduces Autonomous Security to Counter Frontier AI-Driven Cyber Threats — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  112. [112] Claude Mythos and the AI Autonomous Offensive Threshold — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  113. [113] [PDF] The “AI Vulnerability Storm”: Building a “Mythos- ready” Security ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  114. [114] Cloud Security Alliance Draft Paper on Mythos-Class Capability ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  115. [115] Cloud Security Alliance Introduces New Tool for Assessing | CSA — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  116. [116] Cloud Security Alliance launches AI risk initiative — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  117. [117] Nexigen - Cloud Security Alliance “Agentic AI Red Teaming Guide” — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  118. [118] Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Focus in Cloud Computing | CSA — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  119. [119] Security Guidance for Cloud Computing v5 | CSA — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  120. [120] AI Vulnerability Storm: Closing the Discovery to Exploitation Gap — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  121. [121] Beyond Autonomous Attacks: The Reality of AI-Enabled Cyber Threats — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  122. [122] Strategic Technologies Blog - CSIS — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  123. [123] [PDF] Trends in AI incidents and hazards reported by the media | OECD — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  124. [124] 2026 Report: Extended Summary for Policymakers — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  125. [125] Trends in AI incidents and hazards reported by the media - OECD.AI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  126. [126] Trends in AI incidents and hazards reported by the media | OECD — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  127. [127] A simple classification of AI incident trajectories — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  128. [128] International AI Safety Report 2026 — reactive:demis-hassabis
  129. [129] International AI Safety Report 2026 — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  130. [130] (PDF) International AI Safety Report 2026 - ResearchGate — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  131. [131] New International AI Safety Report Spotlights Emerging Risks — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  132. [132] [PDF] International AI Safety Report 2026 — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  133. [133] [PDF] ai-safety-report-2026-extended-summary-for-policymakers.pdf — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  134. [134] International AI Safety Report 2026: A Critical Reading — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  135. [135] [PDF] International AI Safety Report 2026 - arXiv — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  136. [136] [2602.21012] International AI Safety Report 2026 - arXiv — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  137. [137] International AI Safety Report 2026 Examines AI Capabilities, Risks ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  138. [138] [PDF] International AI Safety Report 2026 - Ghost — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  139. [139] 2026 International AI Safety Report Charts Rapid Changes and ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  140. [140] Responsible AI | The 2026 AI Index Report - Stanford HAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  141. [141] [PDF] Open Problems in Frontier AI Risk Management — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  142. [142] The release of the international AI safety report 2026 - techUK — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  143. [143] The 2026 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI — reactive:deepmind-ai-co-clinician
  144. [144] Technical Performance | The 2026 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  145. [145] The 2026 AI Index Report from Stanford and what it says about AI ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  146. [146] Inside the AI Index: 12 Takeaways from the 2026 Report — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  147. [147] Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  148. [148] Policy and Governance | The 2026 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  149. [149] [PDF] Artificial Intelligence Index Report | Stanford HAI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  150. [150] Stanford HAI 2026 AI Index Report Highlights AI Security Gaps — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  151. [151] UK Group Says OpenAI's GPT-5.5 is Comparable to Anthropic ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  152. [152] Anthropic's Mythos Has Landed: Here's What Comes Next ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  153. [153] GPT-5.5: Benchmarks, Safety Classification, and Availability — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  154. [154] AI models are starting to cross a new line in cybersecurity. UK AISI ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  155. [155] OpenAI Releases GPT-5.4-Cyber: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cybersecurity-Specific Large Language Model Capabilities and Application Process - Apiyi.com Blog — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  156. [156] Alberto Romero (@thealgorithmicbridge) - Substack — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  157. [157] Note - Alberto Romero (@thealgorithmicbridge): "" — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  158. [158] Alberto Romero (@thealgorithmicbridge) - Substack — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  159. [159] What Happens When AI Gets Too Good at One Thing — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  160. [160] Archive - The Algorithmic Bridge — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  161. [161] AI Has an Invisible Misinformation Problem - Alberto Romero - Medium — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  162. [162] GPT5.5 slightly outperformed Mythos on a multi-step cyber-attack ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  163. [163] GPT-5.5 agora resolve simulações de ataques de rede autonomamente — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  164. [164] → UK AI Security Institute found GPT-5.5 can autonomously solve complex cyber attack scenarios — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  165. [165] Big change in the high-stakes AI race: GPT-5.5 is now almost even with Claude Mythos Preview in cyber-attack simulations... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  166. [166] For those paying attention to the benchmarks, GPT-5.5 is — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  167. [167] GPT-5.5 just matched Claude Mythos on the same cyber benchmark .... two models, two companies, weeks apart. — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)
  168. [168] GPT-5.5 is on par with Claude Mythos — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  169. [169] GPT-5.5 just matched Claude Mythos on the same cyber benchmark ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  170. [170] Peter Wildeford's Post - LinkedIn — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  171. [171] UK AI Safety Institute warns GPT-5.5 cyber threat matches Mythos — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  172. [172] 【AI Daily Digest】 — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-02)
  173. [173] What is Frontier AI and why are Australian Banks Cyber Terrified of it - Cybersecurity Insiders — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  174. [174] OpenAI vs Anthropic, Cyber Models, and AI Job Subcontracting: The AI Argument EP96 | Frank and Marci — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  175. [175] AI models are crossing a new threshold in cybersecurity capability. — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  176. [176] GPT-5.5 Cyber Breakthrough: Powerful New AI Shields Critical ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  177. [177] Joseph Larson's Post - LinkedIn — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  178. [178] Sacha Ghiglione's Post - LinkedIn — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  179. [179] Amid Mythos' hyped cybersecurity prowess, researchers find GPT ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  180. [180] What Is GPT-5.5? OpenAI's New Flagship Model Explained — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  181. [181] Sam Altman teases GPT-5.5 Cyber rollout as OpenAI doubles down ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  182. [182] Terminal-Bench 2.0 Leaderboard - LLM Stats — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  183. [183] OpenAI's new security model (GPT-5.5-Cyber) is for 'critical ... - Reddit — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  184. [184] Mythos vs. GPT‑5.4‑Cyber — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  185. [185] Anthropic Mythos vs. OpenAI GPT-5.4-Cyber: What Was Actually Announced, and Why the Difference Matters - CyberDistro | Cybersecurity Solutions — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  186. [186] Anthropic's Mythos Claims Questioned by Cybersecurity Insider — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  187. [187] What is Mythos and why are experts worried about Anthropic's AI ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  188. [188] This is just one eval, but it's an important one — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  189. [189] GPT-5.5 is OpenAI's best model. It's also the worst at using ... - Tessl — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  190. [190] OpenAI Announces GPT-5.5-Cyber for Critical Defenders — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  191. [191] Anthropic Claims Its New A.I. Model, Mythos, Is a Cybersecurity ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  192. [192] Mythos has been launched! : r/cybersecurity - Reddit — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  193. [193] BREAKING: OpenAI rolls out GPT-5.4-Cyber to limited ... - Reddit — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  194. [194] 从这张Benchmark看，不是 GPT-5.5 赢了。 — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-04-24)
  195. [195] Everything You Need to Know About GPT-5.5 - Vellum — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  196. [196] LLM Leaderboard 2026 — Compare 300+ Top AI Models by ... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  197. [197] AISI Evaluates GPT-5.5 Cybersecurity Performance Against Advanced Tasks | Let's Data Science — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  198. [198] In the Wake of Anthropic’s Mythos, OpenAI Has a New Cybersecurity Model—and Strategy | WIRED — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  199. [199] GPT-5.5-Cyber rollout: OpenAI’s defender track vs Claude Mythos—what the record actually compares | explainx.ai Blog | explainx.ai — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  200. [200] Assessing Claude Mythos Preview's cybersecurity capabilities — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  201. [201] Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Raises Cybersecurity Alarms : r/Agent_AI — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities
  202. [202] Frontier agentic LLMs now enable both industrialized cyberattacks and advanced defensive operations, with Anthropic's Pr... — reactive:frontier-ai-cyber-capabilities (2026-05-01)