The Information Machine

OpenAI's PAC 'Build American AI' Confirmed False Flag Social Media Campaign

closed · v5 · 2026-06-09 · 78 items · history

What's new in v5

No substantive new information this pass. New items are all social media amplification — URL-only posts and retweets with no new claims, quotes, or named voices. One tweet characterizes OpenAI and Altman as 'bogged down in political spending fight' [30] and another references a broader piece on Silicon Valley's political positioning [31], but neither introduces new facts or perspectives not already established. The story continues to slow with no new investigative reporting or organizational responses.

What

Two PACs with documented financial ties to OpenAI leadership — Leading the Future (LTF) and Build American AI (BAA) — ran fake social media accounts designed to impersonate AI safety advocates. [1] BAA acknowledged the accounts were 'part of their strategy'; LTF accepted responsibility. [8][1] OpenAI condemned astroturfing and is reported to be formally separating itself from Greg Brockman's personal donations to LTF, but critics argue that Brockman's central role in LTF and the company's identical donation records make that separation hard to sustain on the facts. [6][7][10][11]

Why it matters

A well-funded PAC linked to OpenAI's leadership deliberately manufactured fake grassroots opposition to AI safety advocacy, inserting coordinated deception into AI policy debates at scale. OpenAI's credibility as a good-faith actor in AI governance depends in part on how this episode is resolved, particularly as the company actively lobbies to shape federal AI regulation.

Open questions

  • How deep was OpenAI's direct knowledge of BAA and LTF's fake-account tactics, given the company's claim of ignorance alongside Brockman's central role and identical donation records? [13][18]

  • Does OpenAI's reported formal separation from Brockman's personal donations represent genuine organizational distance, or primarily reputational management? [6][7]

  • Will any regulatory or investigative body examine LTF or BAA's tactics, given that the $100M super PAC structure targeting the 2026 midterms remains intact? [14][8]

  • How will the White House's reported irritation with LTF's super PAC affect OpenAI's relationship with the Trump administration on AI regulation? [17]

Narrative

Two political action committees with documented financial ties to OpenAI executives and Andreessen Horowitz — Leading the Future (LTF) and Build American AI (BAA) — were found to have operated fake social media accounts designed to impersonate AI safety advocates. The accounts posted content discrediting AI safety concerns, with some reportedly including calls to violence. [1] Journalists Tyler Johnston and Taylor Lorenz investigated and published their findings; BAA, when confronted, acknowledged the fake accounts were part of its deliberate strategy. [1][2] Personas used in the operation included handles like 'Jonathan Doomer,' apparently designed to mock AI safety concerns. [3]

OpenAI responded with a public statement that advocacy groups 'should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not engage in astroturfing.' [4][5] The company's position subsequently sharpened: multiple outlets reported that OpenAI was drawing a formal line between itself and Brockman's personal donations to LTF, not merely distancing from LTF's tactics. [6][7] LTF accepted responsibility for the operation under public and journalistic pressure. [8][9]

That disavowal drew immediate skepticism. OpenAI and Brockman reportedly made identical contributions to LTF, and Brockman is a central figure in LTF's structure. [10][11] An Axios report from January 2026 documented Brockman and a16z channeling cash to the pro-AI super PAC months before the fake-account story broke. [12] Zvi Mowshowitz called OpenAI's claim of non-involvement '100% pure unadulterated bullshit' and described the episode as genuine misconduct requiring accountability. [1] Tyler Johnston maintained that even taking OpenAI at its word, donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates the company in the outcome. [13]

The episode sits within a wider pattern of political activity. LTF raised $100M and targeted the 2026 midterms; LTF also reportedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI reporters. [14][15] OpenAI has separately been running a $10M campaign for national AI oversight. [16] NBC News reported the White House viewed LTF's $100M super PAC as a 'slap in the face.' [17] The fake-account operation fits within a pattern of attempting to shape AI debates by undermining critics rather than engaging them directly.

Timeline

  • 2025-08-26: Washington Post, Fortune, and WSJ report LTF has $100M and is targeting the 2026 midterms, establishing the PAC's scale and political ambitions on record. [14][26][27]
  • 2026-01-30: Axios reports Brockman and a16z publicly channeling cash to LTF's pro-AI super PAC, establishing the financial relationship months before the fake-account story. [12]
  • 2026-05-20: POLITICO reports on OpenAI's broader political strategy, including PAC activity. [25]
  • 2026-05-30: Reports surface of two competing AI-backed PACs — Public First and Leading the Future — working to influence AI policy. [28]
  • 2026-06-02: OpenAI issues a statement condemning astroturfing and distancing itself from LTF's tactics. [11][4][5]
  • 2026-06-02: Reports reveal OpenAI and Brockman made identical contributions to LTF, complicating the company's disavowal. [10]
  • 2026-06-02: NBC News reports the White House viewed LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC as a 'slap in the face.' [17]
  • 2026-06-02: Multiple outlets report OpenAI drawing a formal line between itself and Brockman's personal donations to LTF — a sharper separation than its initial statement. [6][7][29]
  • 2026-06-03: Reports emerge that LTF's super PAC allegedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI reporters. [15]
  • 2026-06-04: Build American AI explicitly acknowledges the fake social media accounts were 'part of their strategy.' [1]
  • 2026-06-04: Leading the Future accepts responsibility for the fake-account operation. [8][9]
  • 2026-06-04: Zvi Mowshowitz publishes a detailed critique calling OpenAI's denial 'unadulterated bullshit' and calling for accountability. [1]
  • 2026-06-04: Tyler Johnston and Taylor Lorenz continue coverage; Johnston maintains heavy donations without vetting implicates OpenAI regardless of what it knew. [20][21][13]
  • 2026-06-09: Social media amplification continues; commentary frames OpenAI and Altman as 'bogged down in political spending fight.' [30] [30][31]

Perspectives

OpenAI

Condemned astroturfing in a public statement, distanced itself from LTF's tactics, and is reported to be formally separating itself from Brockman's personal donations.

Evolution: Position sharpened from disavowing LTF's methods to reportedly disavowing Brockman's donations specifically — but critics dispute whether either move is credible given the financial record.

[11][4][5][6][7]

Tyler Johnston

Skeptical that OpenAI's disavowal is genuine; argues donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates OpenAI regardless of what it knew about specific tactics.

Evolution: Consistent throughout; acknowledged LTF's acceptance of responsibility as positive without letting OpenAI off the hook.

[18][19][13][20][8][9]

Taylor Lorenz

Co-investigator; frames the operation as 'repeated, egregious astroturfing.'

Evolution: Consistent critical stance throughout.

[21]

Zvi Mowshowitz

OpenAI's denial of involvement is false; the PAC's operation constitutes genuine misconduct; the episode warrants running the responsible actors 'out of town on a rail.'

Evolution: Consistent with his broader skepticism of OpenAI's political conduct; this episode hardened that position.

[1][22]

Leading the Future (LTF)

Accepted responsibility for the fake-account operation under public and journalistic pressure.

Evolution: Moved from silence to acknowledgment; the $100M super PAC structure targeting the midterms remains intact.

[8][9]

Build American AI (BAA)

Acknowledged the fake social media accounts were 'part of their strategy' — an explicit admission that sits in direct contradiction to OpenAI's public disavowal.

Evolution: More direct than LTF's acknowledgment; no further public evolution recorded.

[1][2]

Nathan Calvin

Reads OpenAI's statement as significant and LTF's acceptance of responsibility as meaningful, but treats neither as exculpatory.

Evolution: Cautiously analytical; consistent across coverage.

[23][24]

White House

Viewed LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC as a 'slap in the face,' indicating friction between OpenAI's political operation and the administration.

Evolution: No prior stance on record; this is the first noted reaction.

[17]

Tensions

  • OpenAI claims no prior knowledge of LTF's fake-account tactics; Johnston and Mowshowitz argue that the financial connections and shared personnel make genuine ignorance implausible. [18][1][10]
  • BAA says fake accounts were 'part of their strategy,' while OpenAI's public statement condemns astroturfing — two positions from organizations with overlapping funding in direct contradiction. [1][4]
  • OpenAI is reportedly drawing a line between itself and Brockman's personal donations, while Brockman's central role in LTF and the company's identical donation records make that separation difficult to sustain on the facts. [6][7][10][11]
  • Johnston argues that donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates OpenAI in the outcome regardless of specific knowledge; OpenAI's statement implies its disavowal is sufficient. [13][4]
  • The White House's irritation with LTF's $100M super PAC runs against OpenAI's apparent goal of maintaining a favorable political relationship with the Trump administration through its lobbying activities. [17][25]

Status: cooling down

Sources

  1. [1] AI #171: False Flag — Zvi's AI Roundups (2026-06-04)
  2. [2] TLDR: to discredit AI safety advocates, the OpenAI/a16z Super Pac ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  3. [3] @Ric_RTP "Doomers Are Dumb" and "Jonathan Doomer" — the synthetic reality engine in political operation. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  4. [4] "Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  5. [5] "Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  6. [6] OpenAI Distances Itself From Cofounder Brockman's Political Donations - Business Insider — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  7. [7] OpenAI draws a line between the company and a cofounder's ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  8. [8] I'm glad that Leading The Future stepped up to take responsibility for this. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  9. [9] I'm glad that Leading The Future stepped up to take responsibility for this. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  10. [10] OpenAI Really Doesn’t Like the Attention Its Co-Founder’s Political Donations Are Getting. They also made identical cont... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  11. [11] OpenAI has issued a statement in regards to Greg Brockman and Leading the Future. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  12. [12] OpenAI's Brockman and a16Z funnel cash to pro-AI super PAC - Axios — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  13. [13] And, even if OpenAI and the Brockmans didn’t previously know about these tactics, you’d think that donating so much, wit... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  14. [14] Pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future has $100M and targets midterms - The Washington Post — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  15. [15] OpenAI's super PAC allegedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  16. [16] $10M campaign launched for national AI regulation - The Hill — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  17. [17] 'Slap in the face': White House irked by a new $100M pro-AI super ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  18. [18] But in their statement, OpenAI also disavowed any knowledge of the PAC’s activities and disavowed astroturfing. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  19. [19] I would like to believe OpenAI when they claim to be above all of this. But I fear that they aren’t. The same worldview ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  20. [20] If I ran the OpenAI/a16z super PAC, I would simply not pollute the commons with repeated, egregious astroturfing. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  21. [21] RT @tyler_johnston: If I ran the OpenAI/a16z super PAC, I would simply not pollute the commons with repeated, egregious ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  22. [22] “AI #171: False Flag” by Zvi–LessWrong (30+ Karma) - Apple Podcasts — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  23. [23] @TaylorLorenz Seems like maybe this statement from OpenAI earlier this week further distancing itself from LTF and menti... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  24. [24] Overall my reaction to this doc is pleasant surprise, and I think this proposal takes AI progress and risks seriously, i... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  25. [25] Inside the next phase of OpenAI's political strategy - POLITICO — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  26. [26] OpenAI’s president and Andreessen Horowitz are leading a $100 million pro-AI push in U.S. politics | Fortune — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  27. [27] Silicon Valley Launches Pro-AI PACs to Defend Industry in Midterm ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  28. [28] Two AI-backed political action committees, Public First and Leading the Future, are locked in a heated battle to influen... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-05-30)
  29. [29] OpenAI distancing itself from Leading the Future—a group backed by co-founder Greg Brockman—shows how messy AI lobbying ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  30. [30] Altman, OpenAI get bogged down in political spending fight — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-09)
  31. [31] 🇺🇸 The Mogul Midterms: Why Silicon Valley’s MAGA Bet May Be Backfiring — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-08)