The Information Machine

OpenAI's PAC 'Build American AI' Confirmed False Flag Social Media Campaign

open · v2 · 2026-06-05 · 48 items · history

What's new in v2

The main development this pass is OpenAI formally drawing a line between itself and Brockman's personal donations — a harder separation than its earlier statement condemning LTF's tactics — covered by Business Insider and Yahoo News. [6][7] An Axios article from January 2026 has also surfaced, documenting that Brockman and a16z were publicly channeling cash to LTF's super PAC months before the fake-account story broke, which adds a longer paper trail to the financial relationship OpenAI is now trying to distance itself from. [10] No new substantive voices or disagreements emerged; coverage is deepening existing themes.

What

Two political action committees with financial ties to OpenAI executives and Andreessen Horowitz — Leading the Future (LTF) and Build American AI (BAA) — were found to have operated fake social media accounts impersonating AI safety advocates. [1] OpenAI issued a public statement condemning astroturfing while distancing itself from LTF's tactics, but multiple outlets have since reported the company is also drawing a formal line between itself and Greg Brockman's personal donations to LTF — a harder separation than its earlier posture. [6][7] LTF accepted responsibility for the operation; BAA explicitly acknowledged the fake accounts were 'part of their strategy.' [11][1] Critics argue that OpenAI's disavowal is not credible given Brockman's central role in LTF and the company's own identical donation records. [8][9]

Why it matters

If a well-funded PAC linked to OpenAI's leadership deliberately manufactured fake grassroots opposition to the AI safety movement, coordinated deception entered AI policy debates at scale. OpenAI's credibility on AI governance depends in part on being seen as a good-faith actor, and the episode directly tests that standing — especially as the company actively lobbies to shape federal AI regulation.

Open questions

  • How deep was OpenAI's direct knowledge of BAA and LTF's fake-account tactics, given the company's claim of ignorance alongside Brockman's central role and identical donation records? [13][19]

  • Does OpenAI's reported move to draw a line between itself and Brockman's personal donations represent a genuine organizational separation, or primarily reputational management? [6][7]

  • Will LTF's acceptance of responsibility translate into any concrete changes to its operations, given that the PAC's $100M super PAC structure remains intact? [11]

  • How will the White House's reported irritation with LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC affect OpenAI's relationship with the Trump administration on AI regulation? [18]

Narrative

Two PACs with documented financial ties to OpenAI and a16z — Leading the Future and Build American AI — were found to have run fake social media accounts designed to impersonate AI safety advocates. The accounts posted content discrediting AI safety concerns, with some reportedly including calls to violence. [1] Journalists Tyler Johnston and Taylor Lorenz investigated and published their findings; Build American AI, when confronted, acknowledged the fake accounts were part of its deliberate strategy. [1][2] Personas used in the operation included handles like 'Jonathan Doomer,' apparently designed to mock AI safety concerns. [3]

OpenAI responded around June 2, 2026, with a public statement stating that advocacy groups 'should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not engage in astroturfing.' [4][5] The company's position has since sharpened: multiple outlets report OpenAI is now explicitly drawing a line between itself and Brockman's personal donations to LTF, not just distancing from LTF's tactics. [6][7] That distancing drew immediate skepticism — OpenAI and Brockman reportedly made identical contributions to LTF, and Brockman is a central figure in LTF's structure. [8][9] An Axios report from January 2026 had already documented Brockman and a16z funneling cash to the pro-AI super PAC, establishing the financial relationship well before the fake-account story broke. [10]

LTF subsequently stepped up to accept responsibility for the operation. [11][12] Zvi Mowshowitz called OpenAI's claim of non-involvement '100% pure unadulterated bullshit' and characterized the operation as genuine misconduct requiring accountability. [1] Tyler Johnston acknowledged LTF's acceptance of responsibility as a positive step while maintaining that the underlying pattern of behavior implicates OpenAI regardless of what it knew. [13][14] Nathan Calvin read LTF's acknowledgment as meaningful but incomplete, and treated OpenAI's statement as significant without finding it exculpatory. [15][16]

The political backdrop includes OpenAI's active lobbying push for favorable federal AI regulation — including a $10M campaign for national AI oversight [17] and LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC, which the White House reportedly viewed as a 'slap in the face.' [18] The fake-account operation fits within a wider pattern of political activity that observers describe as an attempt to shape the AI debate by undermining critics rather than engaging them directly.

Timeline

  • 2026-01-30: Axios reports Brockman and a16z publicly channeling cash to LTF's pro-AI super PAC, establishing the financial relationship on record. [10]
  • 2026-05-20: POLITICO reports on OpenAI's broader political strategy, including PAC activity. [22]
  • 2026-05-30: Reports surface of two competing AI-backed PACs — Public First and Leading the Future — working to influence AI policy. [23]
  • 2026-06-02: OpenAI issues a statement condemning astroturfing and distancing itself from LTF, while Brockman's central role in LTF draws attention. [9][4][5]
  • 2026-06-02: Reports reveal OpenAI and Brockman made identical contributions to LTF, complicating the company's disavowal. [8]
  • 2026-06-02: NBC News reports the White House viewed LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC as a 'slap in the face.' [18]
  • 2026-06-02: Multiple outlets report OpenAI drawing a formal line between itself and Brockman's personal donations to LTF — a sharper separation than its initial statement. [6][7][24]
  • 2026-06-03: Reports emerge that LTF's super PAC allegedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI reporters. [25]
  • 2026-06-04: Build American AI explicitly acknowledges the fake social media accounts were 'part of their strategy.' [1]
  • 2026-06-04: Leading the Future steps up to accept responsibility for the operation. [11][12]
  • 2026-06-04: Zvi Mowshowitz publishes a detailed critique calling OpenAI's denial 'unadulterated bullshit' and calling for accountability. [1]
  • 2026-06-04: Tyler Johnston and Taylor Lorenz continue coverage; Johnston maintains that even taking OpenAI at its word, heavy donations without vetting implicates the company. [14][21][13]

Perspectives

OpenAI

Condemned astroturfing in a public statement, distanced itself from LTF's tactics, and is now reported to be drawing a formal line between itself and Brockman's personal donations.

Evolution: Position has sharpened from disavowing LTF's methods to reportedly disavowing Brockman's donations specifically — but critics dispute whether either move is credible.

[9][4][5][6][7]

Tyler Johnston

Skeptical that OpenAI's disavowal is genuine; argues that donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates OpenAI regardless of what it knew about specific tactics.

Evolution: Consistent through the investigation; acknowledged LTF's acceptance of responsibility as positive without letting OpenAI off the hook.

[19][20][13][14][11][12]

Taylor Lorenz

Co-investigator; frames the operation as 'repeated, egregious astroturfing.'

Evolution: Consistent critical stance throughout.

[21]

Zvi Mowshowitz

OpenAI's denial of involvement is false; the PAC's operation constitutes genuine misconduct; the episode warrants running the responsible actors 'out of town on a rail.'

Evolution: Consistent with his broader skepticism of OpenAI's political conduct; this episode represents a hardening of that position.

[1]

Leading the Future (LTF)

Stepped up to accept responsibility for the fake-account operation.

Evolution: Moved from silence to acknowledgment under public and journalistic pressure.

[11][12]

Build American AI (BAA)

Acknowledged the fake social media accounts were 'part of their strategy.'

Evolution: The explicit admission is more direct than LTF's acknowledgment and sits in direct contradiction to OpenAI's public disavowal.

[1][2]

Nathan Calvin

Reads OpenAI's statement as significant and LTF's acceptance of responsibility as meaningful, but treats neither as exculpatory.

Evolution: Cautiously analytical; consistent across coverage.

[15][16]

White House

Viewed LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC as a 'slap in the face,' indicating friction between OpenAI's political operation and the administration.

Evolution: No prior stance on record; this is the first noted reaction.

[18]

Tensions

  • OpenAI claims no prior knowledge of LTF's fake-account tactics; Johnston and Mowshowitz argue that the financial connections and shared personnel make genuine ignorance implausible. [19][1][8]
  • Build American AI says fake accounts were 'part of their strategy,' while OpenAI's public statement condemns astroturfing as contrary to its values — the two positions, from organizations with overlapping funding, are in direct contradiction. [1][4]
  • OpenAI is reportedly drawing a line between itself and Brockman's personal donations, while Brockman's central role in LTF and the company's identical donation records make that separation difficult to sustain on the facts. [6][7][8][9]
  • Johnston argues that even if OpenAI and the Brockmans did not know the specific tactics, donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates them in the outcome; OpenAI's statement implies its disavowal is sufficient. [13][4]
  • The White House's irritation with LTF's $100M super PAC runs against OpenAI's apparent goal of maintaining a favorable political relationship with the Trump administration through its lobbying activities. [18][22]

Status: active and growing

Sources

  1. [1] AI #171: False Flag — Zvi's AI Roundups (2026-06-04)
  2. [2] TLDR: to discredit AI safety advocates, the OpenAI/a16z Super Pac ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  3. [3] @Ric_RTP "Doomers Are Dumb" and "Jonathan Doomer" — the synthetic reality engine in political operation. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  4. [4] "Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  5. [5] "Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  6. [6] OpenAI Distances Itself From Cofounder Brockman's Political Donations - Business Insider — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  7. [7] OpenAI draws a line between the company and a cofounder's ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  8. [8] OpenAI Really Doesn’t Like the Attention Its Co-Founder’s Political Donations Are Getting. They also made identical cont... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  9. [9] OpenAI has issued a statement in regards to Greg Brockman and Leading the Future. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  10. [10] OpenAI's Brockman and a16Z funnel cash to pro-AI super PAC - Axios — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  11. [11] I'm glad that Leading The Future stepped up to take responsibility for this. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  12. [12] I'm glad that Leading The Future stepped up to take responsibility for this. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  13. [13] And, even if OpenAI and the Brockmans didn’t previously know about these tactics, you’d think that donating so much, wit... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  14. [14] If I ran the OpenAI/a16z super PAC, I would simply not pollute the commons with repeated, egregious astroturfing. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  15. [15] @TaylorLorenz Seems like maybe this statement from OpenAI earlier this week further distancing itself from LTF and menti... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  16. [16] Overall my reaction to this doc is pleasant surprise, and I think this proposal takes AI progress and risks seriously, i... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  17. [17] $10M campaign launched for national AI regulation - The Hill — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  18. [18] 'Slap in the face': White House irked by a new $100M pro-AI super ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  19. [19] But in their statement, OpenAI also disavowed any knowledge of the PAC’s activities and disavowed astroturfing. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  20. [20] I would like to believe OpenAI when they claim to be above all of this. But I fear that they aren’t. The same worldview ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  21. [21] RT @tyler_johnston: If I ran the OpenAI/a16z super PAC, I would simply not pollute the commons with repeated, egregious ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  22. [22] Inside the next phase of OpenAI's political strategy - POLITICO — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  23. [23] Two AI-backed political action committees, Public First and Leading the Future, are locked in a heated battle to influen... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-05-30)
  24. [24] OpenAI distancing itself from Leading the Future—a group backed by co-founder Greg Brockman—shows how messy AI lobbying ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  25. [25] OpenAI's super PAC allegedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag