The Information Machine

OpenAI's PAC 'Build American AI' Confirmed False Flag Social Media Campaign · history

Version 4

2026-06-08 08:16 UTC · 70 items

What

Two political action committees with documented financial ties to OpenAI executives and Andreessen Horowitz — Leading the Future (LTF) and Build American AI (BAA) — operated fake social media accounts designed to impersonate AI safety advocates. [1] BAA acknowledged the accounts were 'part of their strategy'; LTF accepted responsibility for the operation. [8][1] OpenAI issued a public statement condemning astroturfing and is reported to be formally separating itself from Greg Brockman's personal donations to LTF. [6][7] Critics argue that Brockman's central role in LTF and the company's own identical donation records make that separation difficult to sustain. [10][11]

Why it matters

A well-funded PAC linked to OpenAI's leadership deliberately manufactured fake grassroots opposition to AI safety advocacy, inserting coordinated deception into AI policy debates at scale. OpenAI's credibility as a good-faith actor in AI governance depends in part on how this episode is resolved, particularly as the company actively lobbies to shape federal AI regulation.

Open questions

  • How deep was OpenAI's direct knowledge of BAA and LTF's fake-account tactics, given the company's claim of ignorance alongside Brockman's central role and identical donation records? [13][20]

  • Does OpenAI's reported formal separation from Brockman's personal donations represent genuine organizational distance, or primarily reputational management? [6][7]

  • Will any regulatory or investigative body examine LTF or BAA's tactics, given that the $100M super PAC structure targeting the 2026 midterms remains intact? [14][8]

  • How will the White House's reported irritation with LTF's super PAC affect OpenAI's relationship with the Trump administration on AI regulation? [18]

Narrative

Two political action committees with documented financial ties to OpenAI executives and Andreessen Horowitz — Leading the Future (LTF) and Build American AI (BAA) — were found to have operated fake social media accounts designed to impersonate AI safety advocates. The accounts posted content discrediting AI safety concerns, with some reportedly including calls to violence. [1] Journalists Tyler Johnston and Taylor Lorenz investigated and published their findings; Build American AI, when confronted, acknowledged the fake accounts were part of its deliberate strategy. [1][2] Personas used in the operation included handles like 'Jonathan Doomer,' apparently designed to mock AI safety concerns. [3]

OpenAI responded with a public statement that advocacy groups 'should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not engage in astroturfing.' [4][5] The company's position subsequently sharpened: multiple outlets reported that OpenAI was drawing a formal line between itself and Brockman's personal donations to LTF, not merely distancing from LTF's tactics. [6][7] LTF stepped up to accept responsibility for the operation. [8][9]

That disavowal drew immediate skepticism. OpenAI and Brockman reportedly made identical contributions to LTF, and Brockman is a central figure in LTF's structure. [10][11] An Axios report from January 2026 documented Brockman and a16z channeling cash to the pro-AI super PAC months before the fake-account story broke. [12] Zvi Mowshowitz called OpenAI's claim of non-involvement '100% pure unadulterated bullshit' and described the episode as genuine misconduct requiring accountability. [1] Tyler Johnston maintained that even taking OpenAI at its word, donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates the company in the outcome. [13]

The episode sits within a wider pattern of political activity. A Washington Post report and a Fortune article from August 2025 documented LTF's $100M super PAC and its intent to target the 2026 midterms; a WSJ piece confirmed Silicon Valley's broader pro-AI PAC push in the same period. [14][15][16] OpenAI has separately been running a $10M campaign for national AI oversight. [17] NBC News reported the White House viewed LTF's $100M super PAC as a 'slap in the face.' [18] LTF has also been reported to have funded a fake news site staffed by AI reporters. [19] The fake-account operation fits within a pattern of attempting to shape AI debates by undermining critics rather than engaging them directly.

Timeline

  • 2025-08-26: Washington Post, Fortune, and WSJ report LTF has $100M and is targeting the 2026 midterms, establishing the PAC's scale and political ambitions on record. [14][15][16]
  • 2026-01-30: Axios reports Brockman and a16z publicly channeling cash to LTF's pro-AI super PAC, establishing the financial relationship months before the fake-account story. [12]
  • 2026-05-20: POLITICO reports on OpenAI's broader political strategy, including PAC activity. [27]
  • 2026-05-30: Reports surface of two competing AI-backed PACs — Public First and Leading the Future — working to influence AI policy. [28]
  • 2026-06-02: OpenAI issues a statement condemning astroturfing and distancing itself from LTF's tactics. [11][4][5]
  • 2026-06-02: Reports reveal OpenAI and Brockman made identical contributions to LTF, complicating the company's disavowal. [10]
  • 2026-06-02: NBC News reports the White House viewed LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC as a 'slap in the face.' [18]
  • 2026-06-02: Multiple outlets report OpenAI drawing a formal line between itself and Brockman's personal donations to LTF — a sharper separation than its initial statement. [6][7][29]
  • 2026-06-03: Reports emerge that LTF's super PAC allegedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI reporters. [19]
  • 2026-06-04: Build American AI explicitly acknowledges the fake social media accounts were 'part of their strategy.' [1]
  • 2026-06-04: Leading the Future accepts responsibility for the fake-account operation. [8][9]
  • 2026-06-04: Zvi Mowshowitz publishes a detailed critique calling OpenAI's denial 'unadulterated bullshit' and calling for accountability. [1]
  • 2026-06-04: Tyler Johnston and Taylor Lorenz continue coverage; Johnston maintains that heavy donations without vetting implicates OpenAI regardless of what it knew. [22][23][13]

Perspectives

OpenAI

Condemned astroturfing in a public statement, distanced itself from LTF's tactics, and is reported to be formally separating itself from Brockman's personal donations.

Evolution: Position sharpened from disavowing LTF's methods to reportedly disavowing Brockman's donations specifically — but critics dispute whether either move is credible given the financial record.

[11][4][5][6][7]

Tyler Johnston

Skeptical that OpenAI's disavowal is genuine; argues donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates OpenAI regardless of what it knew about specific tactics.

Evolution: Consistent throughout; acknowledged LTF's acceptance of responsibility as positive without letting OpenAI off the hook.

[20][21][13][22][8][9]

Taylor Lorenz

Co-investigator; frames the operation as 'repeated, egregious astroturfing.'

Evolution: Consistent critical stance throughout.

[23]

Zvi Mowshowitz

OpenAI's denial of involvement is false; the PAC's operation constitutes genuine misconduct; the episode warrants running the responsible actors 'out of town on a rail.'

Evolution: Consistent with his broader skepticism of OpenAI's political conduct; this episode hardened that position.

[1][24]

Leading the Future (LTF)

Accepted responsibility for the fake-account operation under public and journalistic pressure.

Evolution: Moved from silence to acknowledgment; the $100M super PAC structure targeting the midterms remains intact.

[8][9]

Build American AI (BAA)

Acknowledged the fake social media accounts were 'part of their strategy' — an explicit admission that sits in direct contradiction to OpenAI's public disavowal.

Evolution: More direct than LTF's acknowledgment; no further public evolution recorded.

[1][2]

Nathan Calvin

Reads OpenAI's statement as significant and LTF's acceptance of responsibility as meaningful, but treats neither as exculpatory.

Evolution: Cautiously analytical; consistent across coverage.

[25][26]

White House

Viewed LTF's $100M pro-AI super PAC as a 'slap in the face,' indicating friction between OpenAI's political operation and the administration.

Evolution: No prior stance on record; this is the first noted reaction.

[18]

Tensions

  • OpenAI claims no prior knowledge of LTF's fake-account tactics; Johnston and Mowshowitz argue that the financial connections and shared personnel make genuine ignorance implausible. [20][1][10]
  • BAA says fake accounts were 'part of their strategy,' while OpenAI's public statement condemns astroturfing — two positions from organizations with overlapping funding in direct contradiction. [1][4]
  • OpenAI is reportedly drawing a line between itself and Brockman's personal donations, while Brockman's central role in LTF and the company's identical donation records make that separation difficult to sustain on the facts. [6][7][10][11]
  • Johnston argues that donating heavily to LTF without vetting its methods implicates OpenAI in the outcome regardless of specific knowledge; OpenAI's statement implies its disavowal is sufficient. [13][4]
  • The White House's irritation with LTF's $100M super PAC runs against OpenAI's apparent goal of maintaining a favorable political relationship with the Trump administration through its lobbying activities. [18][27]

Sources

  1. [1] AI #171: False Flag — Zvi's AI Roundups (2026-06-04)
  2. [2] TLDR: to discredit AI safety advocates, the OpenAI/a16z Super Pac ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  3. [3] @Ric_RTP "Doomers Are Dumb" and "Jonathan Doomer" — the synthetic reality engine in political operation. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  4. [4] "Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  5. [5] "Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  6. [6] OpenAI Distances Itself From Cofounder Brockman's Political Donations - Business Insider — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  7. [7] OpenAI draws a line between the company and a cofounder's ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  8. [8] I'm glad that Leading The Future stepped up to take responsibility for this. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  9. [9] I'm glad that Leading The Future stepped up to take responsibility for this. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  10. [10] OpenAI Really Doesn’t Like the Attention Its Co-Founder’s Political Donations Are Getting. They also made identical cont... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  11. [11] OpenAI has issued a statement in regards to Greg Brockman and Leading the Future. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)
  12. [12] OpenAI's Brockman and a16Z funnel cash to pro-AI super PAC - Axios — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  13. [13] And, even if OpenAI and the Brockmans didn’t previously know about these tactics, you’d think that donating so much, wit... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  14. [14] Pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future has $100M and targets midterms - The Washington Post — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  15. [15] OpenAI’s president and Andreessen Horowitz are leading a $100 million pro-AI push in U.S. politics | Fortune — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  16. [16] Silicon Valley Launches Pro-AI PACs to Defend Industry in Midterm ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  17. [17] $10M campaign launched for national AI regulation - The Hill — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  18. [18] 'Slap in the face': White House irked by a new $100M pro-AI super ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  19. [19] OpenAI's super PAC allegedly funded a fake news site staffed by AI ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  20. [20] But in their statement, OpenAI also disavowed any knowledge of the PAC’s activities and disavowed astroturfing. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  21. [21] I would like to believe OpenAI when they claim to be above all of this. But I fear that they aren’t. The same worldview ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  22. [22] If I ran the OpenAI/a16z super PAC, I would simply not pollute the commons with repeated, egregious astroturfing. — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  23. [23] RT @tyler_johnston: If I ran the OpenAI/a16z super PAC, I would simply not pollute the commons with repeated, egregious ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  24. [24] “AI #171: False Flag” by Zvi–LessWrong (30+ Karma) - Apple Podcasts — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  25. [25] @TaylorLorenz Seems like maybe this statement from OpenAI earlier this week further distancing itself from LTF and menti... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-04)
  26. [26] Overall my reaction to this doc is pleasant surprise, and I think this proposal takes AI progress and risks seriously, i... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-03)
  27. [27] Inside the next phase of OpenAI's political strategy - POLITICO — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag
  28. [28] Two AI-backed political action committees, Public First and Leading the Future, are locked in a heated battle to influen... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-05-30)
  29. [29] OpenAI distancing itself from Leading the Future—a group backed by co-founder Greg Brockman—shows how messy AI lobbying ... — reactive:openai-pac-false-flag (2026-06-02)